Press "Enter" to skip to content

Congress, states hold the keys to telehealth expansion

An govt order signed Monday directed a swath of federal businesses to broaden telehealth providers after the pandemic ends. But at this level, a lot of that work will likely be up to Congress and state governments.

The directive ordered the Department of Health and Human Services to draft up a coverage that might preserve Medicare’s expanded telehealth protection after the Covid-19 pandemic ends, and for a number of businesses to create a plan to enhance communications infrastructure in rural areas.

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, too, introduced plans to add extra coated telehealth providers subsequent yr to its proposed Medicare physician fee schedule.

Ultimately, Congress and state legislators can have the last say in shaping what telehealth seems to be like in the close to future.

“I think the administration is pushing as far as they can within reason in terms of making sure (telehealth) is reimbursed and trying to put forward programs to expand infrastructure and access, particularly in rural America,” American Telemedicine Association Director of Public Policy Kyle Zebley stated in a telephone interview. “But at the end of the day, as helpful as these actions have been, so much of this is going to by necessity require changes in statute and laws passed by Congress to really seal in the changes by industry we’ve had these past several months.”

Since the begin of the Covid-19 pandemic, states have rolled out dozens of non permanent actions to broaden what telehealth providers are coated by Medicaid, permit suppliers who’re licensed out-of-state to present care, and in some instances, require business insurers to pay the identical for telehealth visits as in-person visits.

At the identical time, CMS lifted restrictions, permitting Medicare to cowl telehealth visits that happen in sufferers’ properties, and for a greater diversity of providers.

The end result has been an explosion of telehealth visits, with roughly 10.1 million Medicare sufferers utilizing telehealth between mid-March and July, in accordance to CMS.

The large caveat, then, is that CMS obtained the authority to waive these telehealth restrictions via the CARES Act.  Once the public well being emergency ends, all the pieces would return to the way it was earlier than, except Congress provides them the authority to preserve a few of these modifications.

“Congress actually holds the keys to this one because they have those requirements in statute,” Jacob Harper, an affiliate with Morgan Lewis, stated in a telephone interview. “The Secretary of Health and Human Services can’t actually override those things.”

There’s already laws in the works to deal with this. A House bill introduced last month would give HHS authority to waive or change Medicare telehealth necessities throughout emergencies “and for other purposes.”

“A lot of this stuff — everyone in the industry would breathe a lot easier if it was passed with legislation,” Zebley stated.

But that also leaves two of the largest remaining hurdles to telehealth to be sorted out: reimbursement and licensing.

Two large hurdles

Currently, with the Covid-19 pandemic, Medicare is paying the identical for telehealth visits as in-person visits. But in the future, if telehealth makes up a a lot bigger portion of whole visits, might that change?

“That’s going to be one of the critical questions that they’re going to have to deal with,” Harper stated.

Private insurers have additionally been grappling with that query. While BlueCross BlueShield of Tennessee was certainly one of the first to say it will broaden its telehealth protection after the pandemic, it hasn’t but stated how a lot it will pay for these providers.

On the state stage, there’s been extra momentum. While most states already required protection parity from non-public insurers, a handful of states added non permanent necessities that they need to pay the identical quantity for telehealth as in particular person visits. And three states — California, Arizona and Washington — have legal guidelines that might require fee parity beginning in 2021.

That leaves licensing, the foremost restriction retaining physicians from taking appointments throughout state strains.

For most states, the resolution has been to be part of the Interstate Medical Licensure Compact, which successfully streamlines the licensing course of for physicians who need to work in a number of states. Some of the most populous states, together with California, Texas, Florida and New York, aren’t presently a part of the compact. But six states — together with New York — have launched laws to be part of the compact.

While it’s a fast resolution, it’s nonetheless not good. The prices add up: on prime of the preliminary $700 to take part in the compact, most states cost greater than $300 to apply of their state, with just a few charging greater than $700.

“I think that could be a mechanism to better this, but the cost of the licensing issue is a tricky one,” Harper stated. “Each state has an incentive to protect doctors and personnel who are already licensed through that state.”

The backside line: whereas telehealth has definitely seen its second in the previous few months, it would nonetheless take an enormous push from many various entities for the momentum to proceed.

“To make this grand experiment really work, I think you need buy in from every stakeholder at some level,” Harper stated. “Everyone needs to be on board here and I think just about everyone is.”

Photo Credit: wigglestick, Getty Images

Be First to Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *